Two Kinds of Simple Church, Part 1
Jonathan Dodson
Talking with our staff last week, I was further convinced of the value of simplicity. We have made some significant changes along the way that have pushed us into being simply the church. I have not read the book Simple Church, but as I see it there are two kinds of simplicity: one that ignores complexity and the other that understands complexity. It is the latter that is shaping our church.
Black & White Simple
The first kind of simple church ignores complexity. This kind of church calls it as they see it. There is one way to do things. They call the outs. This type of "simple church" refuses to frame the gospel in our context, insisting upon using old forms for new times. Like the missionary who exports Western pews, pictures, and pet theologies, simple churches that ignore cultural complexity produce disciples and doctrines that disconnect from the people they are trying to reach. They are simple in missiology, but also in theology. These churches assert that "if we would just interpret the Bible literally," we would all have the same theology. This simplicity ignores the complexity of biblical theology, revelation embedded in history, and culture that alternately affirms and contradicts its historical-cultural context. This kind of simplicity is not what we seek.
Gray Simple
There is another kind of simple church that understands complexity. This kind of church realizes that things are not always what they appear. To use baseball terms, these churches understand that what appears as an "out" to some may appear as "safe" to others. They realize there are two ways to spell gray. This kind of simple church embraces cultural change in a carefully critical way. When carefully considered, the embrace of these changes communicates the gospel faithfully within complex cultural shifts. People understand that the difference between "the world" and "the church" is not black and white. They strive to bring Scripture into the gray context of culture and their relationships. As a result, these churches are constantly theologizing. They realize that theology is not inspired and neither are they. They struggle to take inspired stories, letters, and gospels and learn how to bring them to life in variously delightful and decadent cultures. This process forces them to deal with the complexity of suffering, human flourishing, common grace, and human indifference and come through the other side with a simple, accessible, thoughtful, and replicable way of following Jesus.
